Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a score of 77.7 against 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a more recent 4.4.2 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Although Samsung Galaxy Note3 is older than the Motorola Moto G Fast, it's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
Moto G Fast has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto G Fast also has 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy Note3 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Moto G Fast features just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Fast has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G Fast also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, a camera with a higher resolution and a lot bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
The Moto G Fast counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.