Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. Samsung Galaxy Note4 is an a lot older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's just a little thinner and a little lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen density and a way higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Fast features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Fast features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note4. Both have a 3 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Motorola Moto G Fast takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
The Moto G Fast has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 24 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.