Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting an 80.2 score against 72.2. The Galaxy Note5 design is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G Fast, even though it was released 5 years before. Galaxy Note5 has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G Fast has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note5 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note5 also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Moto G Fast has better battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note5's camera is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Fast one, because although the Galaxy Note5 has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 16 MP back-facing camera and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.