Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast, getting a 79.5 score against 72.2. The Galaxy Note7 is an way older phone than Moto G Fast, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot higher pixel quantity per inch of display.
Moto G Fast has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more processing cores. Moto G Fast captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Fast also counts with a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better memory for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Moto G Fast features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.