Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Pearl white | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Fast, having an 88.3 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 is older than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's body is thinner and lighter. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give identical operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a lot better looking display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a much greater screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G Fast features longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.