Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Pearl white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Moto G Fast, having a 93.6 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older and just a little bit heavier than Moto G Fast, it's body is still somewhat thinner. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should count with identical OS features.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a much better count of pixels per screen inch, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a little bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lot lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.