Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 200.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is way better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a just a bit lighter and thinner cellphone than Moto G Fast, even though both were released only a couple of months apart. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a brighter screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better video frame rates, a much higher resolution camera and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a little longer battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs more money than Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.