Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Pearl white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than Moto G Fast, getting an 86.3 score against 72.2. Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than the Moto G Fast, it's construction is notably lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a lot better pixel amount per inch in the display.
Galaxy S10e features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more internal storage.
The Moto G Fast counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy S10e is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.