Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Pearl white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a global score of 94.8 against 72.2. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11, providing the user lots of additional features. Even when Galaxy S20 and Motorola Moto G Fast were released only 3 months apart, Galaxy S20 is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a lot greater pixels density. The Galaxy S20 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 has a bit faster CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 and Motorola Moto G Fast count with very similar battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low light environments and a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S20 costs a lot more than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.