Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Pearl white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is a bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Fast, and both of them were only released 4 months apart. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user all the same OS features.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a little better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 3 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE has a sharper display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher pixel number per inch in the display, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a much less MP back-facing camera, a lower (4K) video definition and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.