Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has an overall score of 89.1, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE body is newer, lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM.
Galaxy S21 FE features a much better looking display than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way better pixels density. Galaxy S21 FE has a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with just a bit longer battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity. Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Fast also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.