Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Pearl white | Phantom black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has a global score of 98.1, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy S21 Ultra's construction is somewhat heavier but just a little thinner than the Moto G Fast, and they were released only 8 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Moto G Fast, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a quite bigger screen and a lot higher pixel number per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.