Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Pearl white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is way better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. These devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it counts with lots of additional features and optimized performance. The Galaxy S22 is a newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Fast.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot greater pixel count per screen inch.
Galaxy S22 counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S22 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a much bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 costs a lot more money than Moto G Fast, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.