Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Pearl white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a 95.4 score against 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast's, although it's heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 5 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G Fast, because it has a little larger display, a way higher display pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with a way better 108 MP resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Fast, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.