Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S23 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, with a general score of 77.9 against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy S23's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola Moto G Fast. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S23 has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it offers some extra features.
The Moto G Fast has a really superior performance than Galaxy S23, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy S23 has a bit better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot higher pixel density.
The Galaxy S23 has a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger sensor. Galaxy S23 has slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Moto G Fast features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S23, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.