Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a general score of 76, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has newer 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's body is heavier but thinner than the Moto G Fast.
Galaxy S24 FE has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a better display density. The Moto G Fast has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
The Moto G Fast features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 16 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has greater battery life than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Fast, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.