| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Galaxy S24 Ultra has a score of 80.2, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. Galaxy S24 Ultra's construction is way thinner and much lighter than Moto G Fast. Galaxy S24 Ultra comes with Android operating system, while Moto G Fast has Android 11 operating system.
Moto G Fast features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a much higher screen pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot more megapixels camera in the back. The Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.