Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is better than the Moto G Fast, having a score of 82.6 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 design is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than the Moto G Fast. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11.
Galaxy S25 has a way better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixel number per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Moto G Fast features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S25 has a slightly better memory for applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25's battery life is just as good as the Motorola Moto G Fast one. Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Fast, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.