Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.68 ounces | -- |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having a global score of 90.7 against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is much thinner and way lighter than Motorola Moto G Fast. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a very superior processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a much greater pixel quantity per inch of screen, a bit larger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with a much better 200 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better memory to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.