Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has a score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S4 has a newer 4.4.2 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Galaxy S4's body is noticeably lighter and thinner than Moto G Fast, even though it was released many years before.
Motorola Moto G Fast has just a little better performance than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more processing cores. Galaxy S4 features a lot better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot better display pixel density.
The Moto G Fast features a better camera than Galaxy S4, because it has a back camera with a better resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a lot larger diafragm aperture and a much better (4K) video quality. Motorola Moto G Fast features a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Galaxy S4 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.