Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Pearl white | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is slightly better than the Moto G Fast, with a overall score of 77.8 against 72.2. Galaxy S5 Sport's design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Moto G Fast, although it was released many years before. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, providing you some additional features and increased performance.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a little better hardware performance than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Moto G Fast counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G Fast captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a back facing camera with a 16 mega-pixels, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G Fast also counts with a much larger camera aperture.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43% more battery size.
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.