Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is better than the Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Galaxy S7's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Fast, even though it was released 4 years before. The Moto G Fast counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Moto G Fast counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Moto G Fast also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G Fast features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G Fast also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S7 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.