Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Pearl white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a bit better than Moto G Fast, having a 75.8 score against 72.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is extremely older and just a little thicker than Moto G Fast, it's body is still a little bit lighter. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores (but slower).
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Fast takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy S7 Active features a battery life that is just as good as the Moto G Fast one.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is more expensive than Moto G Fast, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.