Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Pearl white | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is much better than the Moto G Fast, with an 81.7 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S8 is extremely older than Moto G Fast, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S8 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S8 features a way better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a lot better screen density. Motorola Moto G Fast takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy S8 has a little bit better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S8 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.