Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto G Fast, with a global score of 77.6 against 72.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is much newer than the Moto G Fast, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a newer 12 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
The Moto G Fast has a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a slightly better screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater display density.
The Moto G Fast features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a bit better battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.