Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is way heavier and way thicker than the Moto G Fast.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way higher count of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Moto G Fast features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater memory for games and applications than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G Fast, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.