Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. Despite being the best device we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than Motorola Moto G Fast. Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical OS features.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Moto G Fast, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Moto G Fast features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher video definition.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Fast. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Moto G Fast, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.