Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 200.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Moto G Fast, with a 92.3 score against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Moto G Fast, even when both were only released 2 months apart. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a brighter display than Moto G Fast, because it has a way better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a way higher screen pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much less mega-pixels resolution camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G Fast counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.