Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is noticeably heavier but noticeably thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and they were released with only 3 months difference. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a sharper display than Moto G Fast, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 1768 x 2208px resolution and a bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 9 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better battery performance than Moto G Fast, because it has a 13% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low light situations and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Fast, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.