Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Pearl white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a lot better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so both should give you very similar operating system features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is notably heavier than the Moto G Fast, it's thinner and also newer.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a way better 1768 x 2208px resolution, a larger screen and more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Moto G Fast counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.