Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black Shadow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| $ 200.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is way better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with a 91.1 score against 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is heavier but noticeably thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
The Moto G Fast counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a bigger screen, a way higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a little bit longer battery life than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto G Fast, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.