Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II is much better than the Moto G Fast, getting an 87.2 score against 72.2. The Xperia 5 II is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Moto G Fast, although both of them were released with only a few months difference. Xperia 5 II counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia 5 II also has a higher amount of RAM.
Sony Xperia 5 II features a more vivid screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Sony Xperia 5 II also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Xperia 5 II features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Sony Xperia 5 II's battery life is very similar to Motorola Moto G Fast's battery performance.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xperia 5 II, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Fast, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.