Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Green and Pink |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 III is a lot better than the Moto G Fast, having a 90.5 score against 72.2. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. Xperia 5 III's body is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Fast. Xperia 5 III counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixels quantity per screen inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Xperia 5 III counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. Xperia 5 III features a bit faster processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia 5 III also has 5 GB more RAM.
Xperia 5 III captures clearer photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xperia 5 III also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xperia 5 III features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.