Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast, having a 94.3 score against 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Xperia PRO has older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11. Xperia PRO's design is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
The Sony Xperia PRO features a much sharper display than Moto G Fast, because it has a much greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a way higher resolution of 1644 x 3840 pixels and a bit bigger screen. Xperia PRO has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia PRO also has a larger amount of RAM.
Sony Xperia PRO has just a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 12 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Sony Xperia PRO also counts with a much bigger sensor. The Sony Xperia PRO has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 480 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Sony Xperia PRO's battery duration is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Fast one.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Fast, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.