Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia XA2 Plus is just a bit better than the Moto G Fast, with a 78.6 score against 72.2. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xperia XA2 Plus has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in this review, the Xperia XA2 Plus construction is older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than Moto G Fast.
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus has a better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a much better 1080 x 2160 resolution. The Sony Xperia XA2 Plus has a bit better processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Xperia XA2 Plus counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 400 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Moto G Fast has a bit better battery lifetime than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3580mAh.
Xperia XA2 Plus shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xperia XA2 Plus also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera with a much better 23 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.