Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has an overall score of 79.8, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Xperia XZ Premium's design is thinner than the Moto G Fast, but it's just a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840px. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos and a higher 19 MP resolution camera.
The Xperia XZ Premium has just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Fast features improved battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 24% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.