Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a 79 score against 72.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance improvements. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's construction is lighter than the Motorola Moto G Fast, but it is thicker and was released many years before.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features an incredibly better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixels density and a way higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 112 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
The Moto G Fast has a superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.