Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is better than Motorola Moto G Fast, with an 82.2 score against 72.2. Even being the best we are comparing, Xperia XZ2 Premium's body is older, somewhat heavier and much thicker than Motorola Moto G Fast. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a little faster CPU than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a way greater display density. Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a back camera with a higher 19 megapixels resolution.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 112 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory. Motorola Moto G Fast has just a bit longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Fast, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.