Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZs has a global score of 77.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G Fast's 72.2 overall score. The Sony Xperia XZs is an notably older phone than Moto G Fast, but it's somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Moto G Fast has a bit better processing unit than Xperia XZs, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores.
The Xperia XZs has a more vivid screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Fast also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. Sony Xperia XZs captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures, a higher resolution back facing camera and higher video frame rates.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZs, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Fast, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.