Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia Z4v is a bit better than the Moto G Fast, getting a overall score of 78.8 against 72.2. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Sony Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11. Even though the Sony Xperia Z4v is incredibly older than Moto G Fast, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Xperia Z4v has a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. Xperia Z4v features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount, the Xperia Z4v also has an additional graphics processor.
Xperia Z4v counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much higher 20.7 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Moto G Fast has a much better storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G Fast also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Fast features superior battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Sony Xperia Z4v is more expensive than Moto G Fast, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.