Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Pearl white | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a global score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should count with the same OS features. The TCL 20 Pro 5G construction has the same thickness than the Moto G Fast, but it's just a bit heavier.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has just a little better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a sharper display than Moto G Fast, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.