Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a general score of 80.4, which is better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark has 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version, providing you some additional features. Xiaomi Black Shark's body has the same thickness than Moto G Fast, but it's just a little bit heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a much better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a better pixel number per display inch. Xiaomi Black Shark features a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a battery performance that's very similar to Moto G Fast's battery performance.
Moto G Fast takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Fast also has a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments and a larger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.