Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Pearl white | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a score of 86.6, which is much better than the Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the older 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3's construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto G Fast.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a better looking display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bigger display and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much more megapixels back camera and a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.