Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Pearl white | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 200.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a score of 88.3, which is way better than the Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 construction is newer, but a little heavier and thicker than Moto G Fast. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a little better performance than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a much better display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a higher display density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger display. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a much more MP back camera and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a lot more expensive than Moto G Fast, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.