Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Pearl white | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is way better than the Moto G Fast, with a general score of 90.7 against 72.2. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a newer and just a bit thinner device than Moto G Fast, although it is heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a way better display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a much higher screen density and a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features just a bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a very superior camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.