Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 200.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 6 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Fast, having a 76.5 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Mi 6 is incredibly older than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Xiaomi Mi 6 features a much sharper display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920px resolution and a lot greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Moto G Fast features longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3350mAh. The Moto G Fast has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Moto G Fast also has a back camera with a way higher 16 MP resolution, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Although Xiaomi Mi 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi 6, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Fast, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.