Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting a global score of 81.4 against 72.2. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11, so it provides a couple additional features. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is an older phone than Motorola Moto G Fast, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Moto G Fast counts with superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3070mAh. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.