Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Pearl white | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than the Moto G Fast, getting an 82.7 score against 72.2. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the Moto G Fast, but Xiaomi managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a way greater screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Motorola Moto G Fast both have incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.