Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max is slightly better than the Moto G Fast, getting a 77.5 score against 72.2. Even though Xiaomi Mi Max is notably older and a little heavier than Moto G Fast, it's design is still somewhat thinner. Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Mi Max also has a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and more pixels per inch of display.
The Moto G Fast has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Max has longer battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity. Moto G Fast takes slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have a 16 MP back-facing camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Fast also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.