Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is better than Moto G Fast's score of 72.2. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is way older than Moto G Fast, it's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a greater pixels count in each screen inch. The Moto G Fast counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Fast also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Moto G Fast counts with better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Moto G Fast, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.